A few weeks ago I was reading an issue of Canadian Business which had an interesting discussion on mandatory financial licensing for everyone. Although, I find the idea far fetched upon further consideration it does sound like a good concept.
The article was referring to a recent report by Sumit Agarwal, senior financial economist with the Federal Reserve Board, and colleagues who suggest a mandatory financial literacy test for everyone before major financial decisions such as mortgage or major investment. I am sure many would not be too happy with such imposition, however think about the long-term benefits of this proposal.
If a mandatory financial literacy test program existed before the recent mortgage subprime-led-credit crisis things could have been different. Many people would not have taken on subprime mortgages and investors would have been more careful.
One common object to this suggestion is the cost associated for such a program and many taxpayers would not be too happy. Once again we should consider all the long-term savings of such program – if we had this program before the recent economic collapse taxpayers would not be on the hook for billions of dollars in bailout money and the government would not be trillions of dollars in debt. Furthermore, hundreds of thousands of people would have not lost their homes and jobs. Hence this would have saved the taxpayers billions of dollars.
Mandatory financial licensing would also help prevent investment fraud, if investors are forced to take courses and pass tests they will be more likely to detect investment fraud and less likely to fall victim of such scams.
When discussing this idea with the Mrs. one of her arguments was that we would discriminate against those who lack the mental capacity to understand financial concepts and cannot pass these tests. Although this may be true but would that be a bad thing? If one does not understand the risk they are taking and the responsibilities of having a mortgage should they really have a mortgage? Furthermore, we discriminate all the time with other privileges such as driving tests and citizenship tests, there are minimum requirements to obtain either one and if one does not meet these requirements they will not receive the privileges.
Of course we are far from implementing such programs however the recent economic events have made this concept more realistic. There are many other factors that need to be taken into account before such programs can be launched, however I find the idea is worthy of serious consideration.
What are your thoughts on financial licensing? Is it a far fetched concept? Do you feel it is redundant and stupid? Or should the governments give serious consideration to such programs?
Subscribe to Financial Highway
Like what you just read and want to get more great content from Financial Highway? Doing so is easy, just enter your email address below and you'll automatically get Financial Highway posts sent straight to your inbox. Spam? I hear ya, but don't worry, Financial Highway will never spam you or share your email address with anyone. Oh and you can unsubscribe at any time with one simple click.
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
We didn’t need financial literacy tests for individuals 20 years ago because financial institutions weren’t allowed to make loans to people without extensive documentation and proof that they could pay it back. I would rather see them clamp down on lending rules than the average person trying to buy a house.
Great topic for discussion. I hadn’t seen this article.
What is the issue the testing is trying to address? Is it to protect the nation from economic collapse? Or is it to protect an individual from making a stupid mistake? Or is it to protect businesses from taking too much risk? If it is the former, then legislation (which would be required to invoke such testing) is the only recourse the nation has. There are many ways this could be done outside of testing end users of the system. If it is the second or third reason, I’m all for failure. Failure leads to learning. Those that study and make wise choices are rewarded. Those that don’t risk losing their money to those who do. P.T. Barnum nailed it.