<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Investment Advisor’s Conflict of Interest, an Insider view</title>
	<atom:link href="http://financialhighway.com/investment-advisor-conflict-of-interest-an-insider-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://financialhighway.com/investment-advisor-conflict-of-interest-an-insider-view/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog discussing investments, savings, insurance and financial planning ideas to grow wealth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:03:22 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Does Your Advisor have Your Best Interest at Heart? &#124; Million Dollar Journey</title>
		<link>http://financialhighway.com/investment-advisor-conflict-of-interest-an-insider-view/comment-page-1/#comment-1445</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Your Advisor have Your Best Interest at Heart? &#124; Million Dollar Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialhighway.com/?p=1044#comment-1445</guid>
		<description>[...] Is it because he (or she) truly believes you are doing the right thing? Or is it because his income depends on the commission your money generates? Unfortunately there is a high level of conflict of interest between the advisor’s interest and those of his/her client’s. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is it because he (or she) truly believes you are doing the right thing? Or is it because his income depends on the commission your money generates? Unfortunately there is a high level of conflict of interest between the advisor’s interest and those of his/her client’s. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etrade</title>
		<link>http://financialhighway.com/investment-advisor-conflict-of-interest-an-insider-view/comment-page-1/#comment-1135</link>
		<dc:creator>etrade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialhighway.com/?p=1044#comment-1135</guid>
		<description>This is the reason why I shop for better or best commission based investment brokers who can offer and suggest me with different investment opportunities rather than stick to mutual funds. I like mutual funds and I would love to invest in it but I also like to diversify my portfolio (it is a basic rule in investing). 

That is why I have chosen etrade. Since I joined them I was able to take control of my investment and I get more value for my money.  I also got to join a trading network where I gained useful unbiased market insights and analysis from the pros for free!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the reason why I shop for better or best commission based investment brokers who can offer and suggest me with different investment opportunities rather than stick to mutual funds. I like mutual funds and I would love to invest in it but I also like to diversify my portfolio (it is a basic rule in investing). </p>
<p>That is why I have chosen etrade. Since I joined them I was able to take control of my investment and I get more value for my money.  I also got to join a trading network where I gained useful unbiased market insights and analysis from the pros for free!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Review-Welcome Globe and Mail Readers Edition &#124; Financial Highway</title>
		<link>http://financialhighway.com/investment-advisor-conflict-of-interest-an-insider-view/comment-page-1/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Review-Welcome Globe and Mail Readers Edition &#124; Financial Highway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialhighway.com/?p=1044#comment-702</guid>
		<description>[...] are some articles that may interest you: Canadian Discount Brokerage Review Investment Adviser&#8217;s Conflict of Interest; An Insider View TFSA FAQ Understanding the Duties of a Financial Adviser How to Find a Good Financial Adviser? Ask [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are some articles that may interest you: Canadian Discount Brokerage Review Investment Adviser&#8217;s Conflict of Interest; An Insider View TFSA FAQ Understanding the Duties of a Financial Adviser How to Find a Good Financial Adviser? Ask [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Understanding the Duties of Financial Advisors &#124; Financial Highway</title>
		<link>http://financialhighway.com/investment-advisor-conflict-of-interest-an-insider-view/comment-page-1/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>Understanding the Duties of Financial Advisors &#124; Financial Highway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialhighway.com/?p=1044#comment-621</guid>
		<description>[...] Investment Advisor’s Conflict of Interest, an Insider view Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUponShare this on TipdShare this on del.icio.usDigg this!Share this on PFBuzzTweet This!Share this on RedditShare this on TechnoratiEmail this to a friend?Most Commented PostsMoney Hacks Carnival 68- Stanley Cup Final EditionFestival Of Frugality- Honeymoon Destination EditionMoney Hacks Carnival 62- Playoff Edition10,001 Ways To Live Large On A Small Budget-Book Review-Book GivewayThe New Financial Highway-Personal Finance Blog-Contribute And WinIf you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Investment Advisor’s Conflict of Interest, an Insider view Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUponShare this on TipdShare this on del.icio.usDigg this!Share this on PFBuzzTweet This!Share this on RedditShare this on TechnoratiEmail this to a friend?Most Commented PostsMoney Hacks Carnival 68- Stanley Cup Final EditionFestival Of Frugality- Honeymoon Destination EditionMoney Hacks Carnival 62- Playoff Edition10,001 Ways To Live Large On A Small Budget-Book Review-Book GivewayThe New Financial Highway-Personal Finance Blog-Contribute And WinIf you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Money Hacks Carnival 62- Playoff Edition &#124; Financial Highway</title>
		<link>http://financialhighway.com/investment-advisor-conflict-of-interest-an-insider-view/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Money Hacks Carnival 62- Playoff Edition &#124; Financial Highway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialhighway.com/?p=1044#comment-256</guid>
		<description>[...] and get to know a little bit about me. You might want to check out the following popular posts, Investment Advisor&#8217;s Conflict of Interest an Insider View, Lesson From Recession: Diversifying Your Income, What is Critical Illness and Why it&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and get to know a little bit about me. You might want to check out the following popular posts, Investment Advisor&#8217;s Conflict of Interest an Insider View, Lesson From Recession: Diversifying Your Income, What is Critical Illness and Why it&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welcome to the Carnival of Personal Finance &#124; Mighty Bargain Hunter</title>
		<link>http://financialhighway.com/investment-advisor-conflict-of-interest-an-insider-view/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Welcome to the Carnival of Personal Finance &#124; Mighty Bargain Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialhighway.com/?p=1044#comment-240</guid>
		<description>[...] Financial Highway gives an insider view on advisor conflict of interest. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Financial Highway gives an insider view on advisor conflict of interest. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asset allocator</title>
		<link>http://financialhighway.com/investment-advisor-conflict-of-interest-an-insider-view/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>asset allocator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialhighway.com/?p=1044#comment-233</guid>
		<description>I have not been a broker, but I have been in business examining portfolios of brokerage clients. Some of what I found are mind-boggling. This article

&lt;a href=&quot;http://investmentscientist.com/2009/04/08/staggering-cost-of-conflicts-of-interest/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The staggering cost of conflict of interest&lt;/a&gt;

is based on a true story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not been a broker, but I have been in business examining portfolios of brokerage clients. Some of what I found are mind-boggling. This article</p>
<p><a href="http://investmentscientist.com/2009/04/08/staggering-cost-of-conflicts-of-interest/" rel="nofollow">The staggering cost of conflict of interest</a></p>
<p>is based on a true story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://financialhighway.com/investment-advisor-conflict-of-interest-an-insider-view/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialhighway.com/?p=1044#comment-232</guid>
		<description>advisors who charge fees for Asset under management usually have a high threshold to accept clients, generally its from $250k to $500k and i dnt know many who do it for 250K mostly its around 500K. You see the issue for the small investor? 

As for the objection overcoming training haha, there have been many session spend on that maybe i&#039;ll have a post on this topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>advisors who charge fees for Asset under management usually have a high threshold to accept clients, generally its from $250k to $500k and i dnt know many who do it for 250K mostly its around 500K. You see the issue for the small investor? </p>
<p>As for the objection overcoming training haha, there have been many session spend on that maybe i&#8217;ll have a post on this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EconStudent</title>
		<link>http://financialhighway.com/investment-advisor-conflict-of-interest-an-insider-view/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>EconStudent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialhighway.com/?p=1044#comment-231</guid>
		<description>The topic of fiduciary duty is a very complicated one. According to Four Pillars of Investing, US brokers do not have fiduciary duty to their clients. US brokers only need to find somewhat suitable solutions for their clients and maximizing commissions is allowed. Due to the things that I have read about Canadian brokers, I assumed that Canadian brokers do not have fiduciary duty.

I think a 2% or 2.5% for a 2 yr deferred sales charge is ridiculously high. For example, holding a 2.5% MER fund for 2 years would give the fund company a 5% of invested assets assuming there is very little fluctuation in the fund price. The two yr deferred sales charge with .5% annual trailing commission means that a total of 3% to 3.5% of invested assets is paid to the brokerage, translating to 1.5% to 1.75% annually of invested assets.  while the fund company only get 1.5% to 2% of invested assets, translating to .75% to 1% annually. I always thought that the Canadian mutual fund industry is greedy, but by this analysis, it is the brokerage firms who are greedy. 

The way I see it, there are very few good commission based investment solutions in Canada. The ones that I think off my head is Philip Hager &amp; North C series, Claymore Advisor Series, some of the big bank&#039;s funds like RBC Monthly Income A series, and CIBC Index Funds (for those who has 150,000 to invest in them). Do you have any other good ones to add?

I think a good fee based approach is to charge .5% asset management fee and using the F series fund or ETF for the clients. Philip Hager &amp; North has a very good F series from my own analysis. On top of .5% asset management fee, the broker should be able to make money off insurance commissions. As a result, this scenario still allows the broker to make decent money.

I am interesting in hearing what they taught you at &quot;objection overcoming&quot; courses to deal with those who question the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The topic of fiduciary duty is a very complicated one. According to Four Pillars of Investing, US brokers do not have fiduciary duty to their clients. US brokers only need to find somewhat suitable solutions for their clients and maximizing commissions is allowed. Due to the things that I have read about Canadian brokers, I assumed that Canadian brokers do not have fiduciary duty.</p>
<p>I think a 2% or 2.5% for a 2 yr deferred sales charge is ridiculously high. For example, holding a 2.5% MER fund for 2 years would give the fund company a 5% of invested assets assuming there is very little fluctuation in the fund price. The two yr deferred sales charge with .5% annual trailing commission means that a total of 3% to 3.5% of invested assets is paid to the brokerage, translating to 1.5% to 1.75% annually of invested assets.  while the fund company only get 1.5% to 2% of invested assets, translating to .75% to 1% annually. I always thought that the Canadian mutual fund industry is greedy, but by this analysis, it is the brokerage firms who are greedy. </p>
<p>The way I see it, there are very few good commission based investment solutions in Canada. The ones that I think off my head is Philip Hager &amp; North C series, Claymore Advisor Series, some of the big bank&#8217;s funds like RBC Monthly Income A series, and CIBC Index Funds (for those who has 150,000 to invest in them). Do you have any other good ones to add?</p>
<p>I think a good fee based approach is to charge .5% asset management fee and using the F series fund or ETF for the clients. Philip Hager &amp; North has a very good F series from my own analysis. On top of .5% asset management fee, the broker should be able to make money off insurance commissions. As a result, this scenario still allows the broker to make decent money.</p>
<p>I am interesting in hearing what they taught you at &#8220;objection overcoming&#8221; courses to deal with those who question the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://financialhighway.com/investment-advisor-conflict-of-interest-an-insider-view/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialhighway.com/?p=1044#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Yes almost all full service brokerage firms now offer insurance, the brokers actually do have a fiduciary duty to their clients and there is extensive training for it as well as the securities commission pay very close attention to them, however there is the law and than there is the real world. There are some very good and honest commission based advisors, you just have to do a lot of work.

Fee-based advisors can be very expensive for those with small portfolios and not complex needs.

for a 2 yr DSC fund generally it is between 2 and 2.5%, the trailer fees will increase after the 2 year period for equity funds trailer fees are generally about 1%. but there arent many 2 yr low load funds, most are usually 3 yrs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes almost all full service brokerage firms now offer insurance, the brokers actually do have a fiduciary duty to their clients and there is extensive training for it as well as the securities commission pay very close attention to them, however there is the law and than there is the real world. There are some very good and honest commission based advisors, you just have to do a lot of work.</p>
<p>Fee-based advisors can be very expensive for those with small portfolios and not complex needs.</p>
<p>for a 2 yr DSC fund generally it is between 2 and 2.5%, the trailer fees will increase after the 2 year period for equity funds trailer fees are generally about 1%. but there arent many 2 yr low load funds, most are usually 3 yrs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
